ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Multi-modal Features Analysis and Performance Assessment for Endovascular Surgery Skills.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeInterventional skill and assessment are essential for vascular interventionalists prior to performing clinical procedures. However, traditional surgical assessments often fail to deliver objective and accurate results. To address these issues, our study proposes a simulator and an analytical framework for evaluating endovascular procedural performance.
methodsA custom interventional operation simulator included an in vitro silicone phantom, mock circulation loop, visual module, force-sensing module, and custom software for kinematic and force data post-processing. An in vitro study was conducted to deliver medical guidewire to four target vessels by thirty interventionalists and ten medical novices. Four types of features (i.e., vascular morphological, device-vascular model interaction, kinematic and force) were obtained from the interventional tasks. An operational force prediction model was developed and trained using long short-term memory (LSTM) networks based on multi-modal feature datasets. Furthermore, features with significant differences were applied for qualitative and quantitative evaluation via support vector machine and Mahalanobis distance.
resultsThe well-trained LSTM model could predict the operation force, force and torque between instruments and vascular model. The qualitative assessment achieved an overall accuracy of 84.17% for two-class classification to distinguish the novice and expert attempts, and the quantitative assessment could assign effective scores for all attempts.
conclusionsThis work provides an approach for the prediction and assessment of intervention performance behaviors, and results demonstrate the effectiveness of this method for promoting the development of interventional skill assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42437430What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.