Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42437429›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2026

Ablation for paediatric solid tumours: current evidence from a scoping review.

Manal Dhaiban, Nigel J Hall

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Manal DhaibanCambridge University Hospital (CUH), 31 Pakenham Close, CB4 1PW, Cambridge, UK. manaldhaiban1985@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8979-000X
Nigel J HallUniversity Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ablation therapy offers a minimally invasive alternative for selected paediatric solid tumour lesions but published outcomes are inconsistently reported. We Performed a scoping review of the literature from 2000 to 2024, including studies reporting ablation in children aged under 18 years with solid tumours. Data on tumour type, anatomical site, ablation modality, treatment indication, reported oncological outcomes, recurrence, and complications were extracted. Thirty-three studies reported 202 children with 304 treated lesions across various anatomical locations. Radiofrequency ablation was the most frequently reported technique, followed by microwave ablation. The liver and lung were the commonest sites treated, and hepatoblastoma and osteosarcoma were the most frequently reported tumour types. Reported local tumour control was generally favourable in selected patients, although definitions of response and recurrence vary substantially between studies. Major complications were uncommon. Ablation appears technically feasible and generally safe in selected children with solid tumours, but the available evidence is limited by small cohorts, retrospective design and marked heterogeneity in case mix and outcome reporting. Prospective multicentre studies with standardised outcome definitions are needed to better define indications, assess safety and clarify how ablation compares with surgical resection in selected patients.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesNeoplasmsCatheter AblationChildHumansTreatment OutcomeCryoablationMicrowave ablationPaediatric solid tumoursRadiofrequency ablationScoping reviewThermal ablation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.