ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
Ablation for paediatric solid tumours: current evidence from a scoping review.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ablation therapy offers a minimally invasive alternative for selected paediatric solid tumour lesions but published outcomes are inconsistently reported. We Performed a scoping review of the literature from 2000 to 2024, including studies reporting ablation in children aged under 18 years with solid tumours. Data on tumour type, anatomical site, ablation modality, treatment indication, reported oncological outcomes, recurrence, and complications were extracted. Thirty-three studies reported 202 children with 304 treated lesions across various anatomical locations. Radiofrequency ablation was the most frequently reported technique, followed by microwave ablation. The liver and lung were the commonest sites treated, and hepatoblastoma and osteosarcoma were the most frequently reported tumour types. Reported local tumour control was generally favourable in selected patients, although definitions of response and recurrence vary substantially between studies. Major complications were uncommon. Ablation appears technically feasible and generally safe in selected children with solid tumours, but the available evidence is limited by small cohorts, retrospective design and marked heterogeneity in case mix and outcome reporting. Prospective multicentre studies with standardised outcome definitions are needed to better define indications, assess safety and clarify how ablation compares with surgical resection in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42437429What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.