ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
Outcomes and revision rates after antegrade continence enema (ACE) appendicostomy in a single-center LMIC paediatric cohort.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAntegrade continence enema (ACE) appendicostomy is widely used in children with complex colorectal and neurogenic bowel conditions, yet data from resource-constrained settings remain limited. We aimed to describe the experience of a single-center pediatric cohort in a low-middle-income country (LMIC).
methodsA retrospective review of all ACE procedures performed between 2012 and 2026 was conducted. Demographics, diagnoses, indications, complications, surgeries, and functional outcomes (assessed with Milan Bowel Function Questionnaire) were collected from clinical and operative records. Descriptive statistics were applied.
resultsForty-five children (80% male) underwent ACE procedures, with a median age of 8.3 years. Most had appendicostomy; two required cecostomy intraoperatively. The most common diagnosis was anorectal malformation (n = 33, 73.3%), followed by neurogenic bowel (n = 7, 15.5%). Eight patients (17.7%) underwent a concomitant Mitrofanoff procedure. The main complication was skin-level stricture (n = 17, 37.8%), representing the only indication for surgical revision (n = 15, 33.3%), with a median time to revision of 5.5 months. Nearly all patients achieved clinical success, with high satisfaction reported on the questionnaire.
conclusionACE appendicostomy is an effective and satisfactory option in LMICs, with outcomes comparable to high-income settings, supported by careful patient selection and ongoing quality improvement efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.