Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42437372›Full record

SynthesisAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2026

Meta-Analysis: Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet for Induction and Maintenance in Crohn's Disease.

Gitika Batra, Aditi Shukla, Abhirup Chatterjee, Sanjay Chandnani, Arshdeep Singh, Dawesh P Yadav, Himanshu Narang, Kiran Josy, Tarini Shankar Ghosh, Saurabh Kedia and 4 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Plant and Animal Protein Sources in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Evidence and Clinical Implications.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gitika BatraPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Aditi ShuklaPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Abhirup ChatterjeePostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6471-2873
Sanjay ChandnaniLokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College, Mumbai, India.
Arshdeep SinghDayanand Medical College, Ludhiana, India.
Dawesh P YadavInstitute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Himanshu NarangAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6750-1238
Kiran JosyLisie Hospital, Kochi, Kerala, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2902-5058
Tarini Shankar GhoshIndraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Delhi, India.
Saurabh KediaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Mathew PhillipLisie Hospital, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Ajit SoodDayanand Medical College, Ludhiana, India.
Vineet AhujaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5474-9709
Vishal SharmaPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research EMDR/CARE/12/2023-0000572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a contemporary interest in dietary therapies for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyse the clinical effectiveness of the Crohn's disease exclusion diet (CDED) for Crohn's disease (CD).

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus on 10th February 2025 to identify relevant studies using the terms 'Inflammatory bowel disease OR Crohn's disease' AND 'Crohn's disease exclusion diet'. We extracted information and estimated pooled rates for clinical response, clinical remission, and maintenance of remission with CDED alone, or with partial enteral nutrition (PEN), or exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN). We calculated the odds ratio for outcomes with CDED as compared to controls. Risk of Bias was estimated using RoB-2.0, ROBINS-I, and Joanna Briggs appraisal tools.

resultsOf the 508 titles, eventually 17 were included, and 16 studies provided quantitative data. The overall pooled rates for induction of clinical remission at 6-8 weeks with CDED-based interventions were 0.69 (95% CI: 0.65-0.74, I

conclusionsCDED-based dietary interventions appear to be efficacious for inducing remission in Crohn's disease. Well-designed randomised trials are required to further validate the use of CDED as a whole food approach in the induction and maintenance of remission in Crohn's Disease.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseEnteral NutritionHumansRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeCrohn's diseasedietexclusion dietinflammatory bowel diseasenutrition

Identifiers

PMID42437372
PMCPMC13511444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.