Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42437252›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Effectiveness of Opioids for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Arathy Krishna Suresh Babu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Arathy Krishna Suresh BabuGeneral Medicine, Ulster University, Birmingham, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of disability around the world, and pharmaceutical treatments like opioids are often used to treat it. However, the efficacy and safety of opioids in LBP continue to be controversial due to inconsistent results and associated side effects. This systematic review assesses the effectiveness and safety of opioid medication in the treatment of LBP. A systematic search was performed utilising various electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, following a structured methodology in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) principles. Randomised controlled trials that were published in English within the past two decades and evaluated the use of opioids in adults with LBP were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist were used to screen for bias, and a narrative synthesis was done because the studies were not all the same. There were six randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials involving between 83 and 905 people. Opioid formulations, including buprenorphine, hydrocodone, oxycodone/naloxone, and oxymorphone, exhibited overall efficacy in diminishing pain intensity relative to placebo, especially in opioid-naïve individuals. But the magnitude and consistency of the advantage varied across studies, and some treatments showed only a small statistical difference. There were only a few reports of functional improvement, and they were not always constant. Nausea, constipation, and drowsiness were common side effects, although long-term safety outcomes were not fully evaluated. In general, opioids may help with short-term pain relief in people with LBP, but they aren't very useful in the long term because they aren't very effective and very safe and there isn't much evidence for their long-term use. It is advisable to select patients and use them with caution. More high-quality research is needed to understand their role in long-term management better.

Indexed as

buprenorphinechronic opioid uselow back pain (lbp)opioid analgesicsopioid side effectsopioid useoxycodonepain reliefrandomised controlled trials (rcts)systematic review

Identifiers

PMID42437252
PMCPMC13355912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.