ArticleCureus2026
Quality and Readability of Web-Based Information on Fluoride in Arabic: An Infodemiology Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Fluoride plays a critical role in public dental health, and its judicious use is central to caries prevention strategies worldwide. With the exponential growth of internet usage in the Arab world, dental websites in the Arabic language have become increasingly influential sources of health information. However, the accuracy, completeness, and scientific reliability of fluoride-related content on these platforms remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to assess and evaluate the quality and accuracy of fluoride information disseminated through Arabic-language websites. Methods A cross-sectional web-based study was conducted between January and April 2025. Arabic websites were systematically identified using Google, Bing, and Yahoo search engines with standardized Arabic search terms related to fluoride and dental health. Websites were evaluated using the DISCERN instrument, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the Health on the Net (HON) code principles, and a custom fluoride-specific accuracy checklist developed from current evidence-based guidelines. A total of 120 websites met the inclusion criteria. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariate logistic regression were employed for data analysis. Results Of 120 eligible websites, 38 (31.7%) were classified as commercial, 29 (24.2%) as health information portals, 27 (22.5%) as governmental or academic, and 26 (21.7%) as social media-based or blog platforms. Overall website quality was rated poor to fair in 68.3% of assessed websites (n = 82). The mean DISCERN score was 38.4 out of 80 (SD = 11.2). Fluoride-specific accuracy scores revealed that only 44.2% of websites correctly described optimal fluoride concentration for drinking water, 52.5% accurately discussed fluoride toothpaste recommendations, and a mere 31.7% provided correct information regarding dental fluorosis. Governmental and academic websites demonstrated significantly higher quality scores compared to commercial and social media platforms (p < 0.001). Conclusion The majority of Arabic websites provide inadequate, inaccurate, or misleading fluoride-related health information. Significant quality disparities exist across different website categories, with governmental and academic websites outperforming commercial and social media platforms. There is an urgent need for standardized guidelines, regulatory oversight, and professional dental society engagement to improve the quality of fluoride information on Arabic dental websites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.