ArticleCureus2026
International Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Training in France: Experiences of African Physicians.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective To explore the self-reported clinical, educational, technical, and scientific experiences of African physicians undertaking Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) training in France. Design This study was designed as a descriptive cross-sectional multicenter study. Subjects The subjects included African physicians who completed a PRM clinical training placement in France between 2016 and 2024. Methods An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed between February and April 2025. Collected data included clinical activities, exposure to interventional procedures, participation in educational and scientific activities, overall satisfaction, and perceived areas for improvement. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results Twenty-five physicians responded to the survey. Clinical exposure was heterogeneous and predominantly focused on neurorehabilitation. Limited exposure was reported in spinal cord injury rehabilitation, complex prosthetics and orthotics, and amputee rehabilitation. Exposure to interventional procedures varied across training sites. Botulinum toxin injections and corticosteroid injections were the most frequently reported procedures, whereas more specialized interventions remained uncommon. Participation in educational activities was generally satisfactory, while involvement in research activities remained limited. Overall satisfaction with the training experience was high. Conclusion PRM training placements in France provide a valuable educational experience for African physicians. However, significant heterogeneity in clinical and technical exposure highlights the need for improved educational structuring and harmonization of training pathways. These findings support the establishment of minimum practical and educational objectives for international PRM training programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.