ArticleCureus2026
Behavioural and Contextual Predictors of Cyberchondria Severity Among Preclinical Medical Students in India: A Two-Wave Longitudinal Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Cyberchondria, excessive online health information seeking that amplifies health anxiety, is prevalent among medical students. Longitudinal evidence on behavioural predictors of cyberchondria is sparse, particularly from India. Objectives The primary objective was to identify the behavioural and contextual predictors of cyberchondria severity and to assess their cross-wave stability using a repeated-measures linear mixed-effects framework among preclinical medical students. Secondary objectives were to test whether the association between online health-search frequency and cyberchondria was replicated and consistent across two waves, and to examine domain-level subscale trajectories beneath the total score. Materials and methods This was a prospective two-wave cohort study of 100 preclinical medical students at Government Medical College Maheshwaram, Telangana, India. The 15-item Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS-15) was administered at Wave 1 in January 2026 and Wave 2 in April 2026, three months apart, with no intervention between waves. The questionnaire was administered through an online survey form during scheduled department contact hours; participation was voluntary. Paired t-tests, one-way ANOVA with linear trend analysis, wave-specific multiple linear regression, and linear mixed-effects models were used, with Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction for domain-level comparisons. All analyses were performed in R version 4.3.2. Results Online health-search frequency was the strongest independent predictor of cyberchondria across both waves (mixed-model β = 3.49, 95% CI: 2.26-4.71, p < 0.001), with a monotonic stepwise association replicated at both waves (ANOVA p < 0.001 for each). Symptom-searching before consulting a doctor (β = 3.63, 95% CI: 1.28-5.98, p = 0.002), hostel residence (β = 2.98, 95% CI: 0.38-5.57, p = 0.025), and chronic illness in self or family (β = 2.76, 95% CI: 0.56-4.96, p = 0.014) were also independently associated with higher cyberchondria severity. CSS-15 total scores were stable (paired t = -0.376, p = 0.708). Exploratory domain-level analysis suggested decreased physician mistrust (uncorrected p < 0.001; survived Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction) and an increase in reassurance-seeking (uncorrected p = 0.032; did not survive Bonferroni or Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction). Conclusions Online health-search frequency is a robust cross-wave predictor of cyberchondria among medical students, with severity rising in a monotonic stepwise pattern across each higher category of search frequency, replicated at both time points. This finding, together with domain-level divergence in cyberchondria components, supports the evaluation of targeted digital health literacy approaches in medical education, with online health-search behaviour as a candidate focus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.