Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42437205›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Early Outcomes of Proximal Humerus Fractures Treated With Proximal Humerus Locking Plate Fixation Using the Deltoid-Split Approach.

Ajatshatru, Rajesh Arora, Amit Srivastava, Ish K Dhammi, Rakesh Sehrawat, Rahul Kumar, Naveen K Shah, Harsh S Hada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

AjatshatruDepartment of Orthopaedics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Rajesh AroraDepartment of Orthopaedics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Amit SrivastavaDepartment of Orthopaedics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Ish K DhammiDepartment of Orthopaedics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Rakesh SehrawatDepartment of Orthopaedics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Rahul KumarDepartment of Orthopaedics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Naveen K ShahDepartment of Orthopaedics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Harsh S HadaDepartment of Orthopaedics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The deltopectoral approach is the workhorse approach used for plating of proximal humerus fractures. However, the less invasive and less commonly used deltoid-split approach has shown comparable outcomes in selected cases. Literature on its functional outcomes and complications remains limited, especially in the Indian subcontinent. This study evaluates the results of patients with proximal humeral fractures managed by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plating using proximal humerus locking plates (PHLPs) performed through the deltoid-split approach. Materials and methods This prospective case series was conducted in a tertiary hospital after ethical clearance. Twenty-one patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria underwent ORIF using the deltoid-split approach. Minimum follow-up was at least one year. Functional outcomes were assessed using QuickDASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) and VAS (Visual Analog Scale) scores. Complications such as surgical site infection, wound complications, nerve injury, implant impingement, or failure were recorded. Results At 3, 6, and 12 months, mean QuickDASH scores were 24.41, 12.37, and 3.90, and VAS scores were 5.0, 2.94, and 0.2, respectively. All fractures united by nine months. No surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, varus collapse, or implant failure occurred. One case each of implant impingement and malreduction, and two cases of axillary nerve palsy were noted. Conclusion Surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the deltoid-split approach provides good recovery with minimal complications. The outcomes are comparable with those achieved using the deltopectoral approach in the literature. It offers tuberosity access with less soft tissue dissection. Surgeons should be accustomed to both approaches and choose the approach according to the fracture configuration.

Indexed as

deltoid split approachdelto-pectoral approachfunctional outcome in proximal humerus fracturesproximal humerus fracturesproximal humerus locking plate

Identifiers

PMID42437205
PMCPMC13354841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.