ArticleJHLT open2026
The role of navigation bronchoscopy in the workup of lung lesions in lung transplant-eligible patients: A single-center case series.
Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lung transplantation (LTx) eligibility assessment may reveal lung lesions suspicious for malignancy. Histological evaluation of these lesions may provide clarity regarding their origin and prevent delays in transplant eligibility decisions. This single-center case series presents the outcomes of navigational bronchoscopy in patients undergoing evaluation for LTx. Methods: All patients evaluated for LTx between September 2023 and December 2025 with suspicious lung lesions amenable to navigational bronchoscopy with cone-beam CT and navigation software were included in this retrospective single-center study. Results: Out of 173 patients evaluated for lung transplantation, twelve (7%) had suspicious lung lesions. Eight patients were considered eligible for navigational bronchoscopy. The median nodule size was 12 mm (range 6-24 mm), with Herder risk scores ranging from 13% to 84% probability of malignancy. Seven patients had COPD as the underlying disease, with a median FEV₁ of 23% and DLCO of 35%. One patient had chronic lung allograft dysfunction. In all cases, the nodules were successfully reached. No complications occurred related to bronchoscopy or general anesthesia. The median procedure time was 60 min, and the median hospital stay was 7 h. In 88% of cases, the pathological results had direct clinical consequences for transplant eligibility and subsequent management. Conclusion: This series demonstrates that navigational bronchoscopy is a safe and effective diagnostic tool for evaluating suspicious lung lesions in patients undergoing assessment for lung transplantation. It can safely accelerate transplant eligibility decision-making and reduce diagnostic uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.