ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Deep Learning and Radiomics Assessment for Highly Myopic Glaucoma Detection Based on Fundus Photography.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate spatially distinctive features in fundus photographs of highly myopic glaucoma (HMG) by integrating radiomics and deep learning. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: Semi-automated optic disc segmentation was performed on 2000 images sourced from the Retinal Fundus Glaucoma Challenge Edition and Pathologic Myopia Challenge public data sets. We trained models with 628 images, including 217 cases of high myopia (HM), 221 cases of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), and 190 cases of HMG. An external validation set of 106 images was collected including 31, 36, and 39 fundus photographs from patients with HM, HMG, and POAG, respectively. Methods: Semi-automated optic disc segmentation was performed by U-Net combined with manual delineation. Additionally, 5 regions of interest (ROIs) covering the optic disc and its surrounding region were explored. Fundus photography-based radiomics feature selection and optimization were conducted using random forest and support vector machine algorithms, which underwent fivefold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated for radiomics, clinical, and combined models. An external validation set was used to evaluate the models performance, and we also examined radiomics features varied across glaucoma stages. Main Outcome Measures: A total of 414 radiomics features were extracted from 5 regions of interest. We evaluated the model performance using accuracy, recall, precision, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The Youden index was used to determine the cut-off value, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Results: The U-Net-based optic disc segmentation reached a Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.95. The radiomics model detected HMG from HM and POAG achieved the accuracies of 0.97 and 0.85, respectively. Both results exceeded the performance of the clinical model, which achieved 0.90 and 0.71. The top radiomics features achieved AUROC of 0.984 and 0.855 for HMG versus HM and HMG versus POAG in the external validation, respectively, including intensity features in the extra-optic nerve and textural features in the optic nerve. These features showed strong diagnostic capability when stratified by Youden values and exhibited independence from glaucoma progression. Conclusions: The study combined U-Net and radiomics to delineate the spatial distribution biomarkers of HMG, establishing a quantitative classification model correlated with anatomical features. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.