Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42437077›Full record

ArticleZooKeys2026

DNA barcoding of Afrotropical nose flies (Diptera, Calliphoridae, Rhiniinae): species identification, female-male morphotype association, and reference library development.

Arianna Thomas-Cabianca, Kurt Jordaens, Eliana Buenaventura, Arn Rytter-Jensen, Anabel Martínez-Sánchez, Georg Goergen, Santos Rojo, Pierfilippo Cerretti, Thomas Pape

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ZooKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arianna Thomas-CabiancaSenckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden, Dresden, Germany Royal Museum for Central Africa, Department of Biology and JEMU Tervuren Belgium https://ror.org/001805t51.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2126-6222
Kurt JordaensRoyal Museum for Central Africa, Department of Biology and JEMU, Tervuren, Belgium Department of Biology and Biotechnologies "Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy https://ror.org/02be6w209.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4321-5944
Eliana BuenaventuraRigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark https://ror.org/035b05819.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5265-815X
Arn Rytter-JensenNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Biodiversity Centre Cotonou Benin https://ror.org/0556kt608.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3056-7273
Anabel Martínez-SánchezDepartment of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain Senckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden Dresden Germany https://ror.org/016xad343.
Georg GoergenInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Biodiversity Centre, Cotonou, Benin Department of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, University of Alicante Alicante Spain https://ror.org/05t8bcz72.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4496-0495
Santos RojoDepartment of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain Senckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden Dresden Germany https://ror.org/016xad343.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2160-9643
Pierfilippo CerrettiDepartment of Biology and Biotechnologies "Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark https://ror.org/05bpbnx46.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9204-3352
Thomas PapeNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Biodiversity Centre Cotonou Benin https://ror.org/0556kt608.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6609-0609

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA barcoding offers a practical approach to species identification, especially in morphologically complex taxa such as Rhiniinae (Diptera, Calliphoridae). The most extensive COI barcode dataset for the subfamily to date was assembled, combining 216 newly generated sequences with more than 1,150 publicly available records from BOLD Systems and GenBank, with emphasis on Afrotropical taxa. Distance-based analyses, Neighbour-Joining (NJ) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) clustering, were evaluated, as well as automated barcode clustering approaches (ABGD and ASAP), for identifying morphospecies within this group. These analyses recognized 79 putative Afrotropical species, with most morphospecies forming well-supported barcode clusters congruent with morphological identifications. Several lineages, however, including species of

Indexed as

COI reference libraryCytochrome c oxidase Imitochondrial geneRhiniinessex linkage

Identifiers

PMID42437077
PMCPMC13354976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.