ArticlePeerJ2026
Poorer survival in prenatally diagnosed trisomy 18 infants compared with postnatally diagnosed cases: a single-center study.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Trisomy 18 is a common autosomal trisomy that is associated with high perinatal and infant mortality rates. With the widespread use of prenatal screening, many cases have been identified. In contrast, when the diagnosis occurs in the late prenatal period, that is, beyond the gestational limit for termination, or postnatally, careful planning for delivery and neonatal care is required. Emerging evidence suggests that intensive neonatal care can prolong survival and that the prenatal diagnosis may influence subsequent treatment choices. However, few studies have directly compared survival according to the timing of the diagnosis while accounting for treatment policy. Therefore, we compared survival between prenatally and postnatally diagnosed infants with trisomy 18, and examined whether diagnostic timing was associated with the selection of intensive care. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 35 cases of trisomy 18 identified at our center between 2005 and 2024, including 25 prenatally diagnosed cases and 10 postnatally diagnosed liveborn infants. Among the prenatally diagnosed cases, 15 resulted in live births. Survival outcomes were compared between prenatally diagnosed liveborn infants ( Results: Among all liveborn infants, the Kaplan-Meier estimated 12-month survival rates were 8% (95% CI [0.5%-30.6%]) in the prenatal group and 40% (95% CI [12.3%-67.0%]) in the postnatal group, with poorer survival in the prenatal group (log-rank Conclusions: Overall survival was poorer among infants with trisomy 18 diagnosed prenatally than among those diagnosed postnatally, and this difference may be partly associated with differences in treatment policies. These findings suggest that treatment policies following prenatal diagnosis may be associated with survival duration in trisomy 18.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.