ArticleJournal of exercise science and fitness2026
Objective and perceived proximity to parks in relation to physical activity within parks.
Article in Journal of exercise science and fitness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Urban parks serve as important venues for promoting physical activity. This study aimed to examine the associations between both perceived and objective proximity to parks and within-park physical activity (PA) across different intensity levels among urban park users. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in four urban parks in Beijing, China. A total of 399 park users completed questionnaires assessing perceived proximity, demographic characteristics, and within-park physical activity. Objective proximity was measured as Euclidean distance from participants' residences to park centers using the Geographic Information Systems. Multilevel linear regression models were used to examine the associations between perceived and objective proximity and different intensities of within-park PA while controlling for sociodemographic covariates, with bootstrap methods employed for non-normally distributed outcomes. Results: Moderate correspondence was found between perceived and objective proximity measures. Both proximity measures demonstrated significant negative associations with moderate-intensity PA and walking within parks, with exploratory spline analyses indicating that these associations gradually weakened at greater distances beyond approximately 1 mile. No significant associations were found between either proximity measure and vigorous-intensity PA within parks. Although both perceived and objective proximity were associated with within-park PA, these relationships varied across different intensity levels. Conclusions: These findings suggest that proximity may play a more important role in promoting moderate-intensity activities and walking within parks, while for vigorous-intensity activities, factors beyond park distance may be more relevant considerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.