ArticleGlobal qualitative nursing research
Thinking Habits Determine Possibilities for Equity: Results of a Critically Reflective Dialogue Study.
Article in Global qualitative nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the Commission on Social Determinants of Health named the distribution of power, resources, and money as causes of health inequities, gaps between knowledge and action have remained tenaciously wide. This critically reflective inquiry was informed by previous work which revealed incoherencies between evidence and action aimed at reducing health inequities. Drawing on the expertise of seventeen thought leaders in knowledge translation and health equity, this study involved a series of dialogues deeply exploring practices for overcoming this gap. Results point to the importance of cultivating equity 'attunement' as a central promising practice, enabled by four intentional thinking habits, including thinking relationally, reflexively, responsively, and tenaciously. These habits underpin the possibility of coherence between evidence and practice or policy in global and public health, making them determinants of equity action. Thinking habits are pivotal, mutually reinforcing, learned, and intentional practices that carry direct implications for capacity building, teaching, research, and policy. Importantly, at a moment when the world navigates a polarized, anti-equity political climate, this research offers an invitation for individuals, groups and institutions to embrace agency in shaping our futures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.