Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42437018›Full record

ArticleGlobal qualitative nursing research

Thinking Habits Determine Possibilities for Equity: Results of a Critically Reflective Dialogue Study.

Katrina Plamondon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global qualitative nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Katrina PlamondonSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2817-0621

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the Commission on Social Determinants of Health named the distribution of power, resources, and money as causes of health inequities, gaps between knowledge and action have remained tenaciously wide. This critically reflective inquiry was informed by previous work which revealed incoherencies between evidence and action aimed at reducing health inequities. Drawing on the expertise of seventeen thought leaders in knowledge translation and health equity, this study involved a series of dialogues deeply exploring practices for overcoming this gap. Results point to the importance of cultivating equity 'attunement' as a central promising practice, enabled by four intentional thinking habits, including thinking relationally, reflexively, responsively, and tenaciously. These habits underpin the possibility of coherence between evidence and practice or policy in global and public health, making them determinants of equity action. Thinking habits are pivotal, mutually reinforcing, learned, and intentional practices that carry direct implications for capacity building, teaching, research, and policy. Importantly, at a moment when the world navigates a polarized, anti-equity political climate, this research offers an invitation for individuals, groups and institutions to embrace agency in shaping our futures.

Indexed as

Canadacommunity and public healthdeterminants of healthempowermentepistemologyhealth equitymentoringpower

Identifiers

PMID42437018
PMCPMC13354894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.