Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42436815›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2026

Real-time prediction of atrial fibrillation in intensive care unit: a meta-learning approach.

Mehran Moazeni, Sebastian Mildiner Moraga, Maaike Wösten, Paul Elbers, Patrick Thoral, Linda Wilhelmina Van Laake, Folkert Wouter Asselbergs, Emmeke Aarts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mehran MoazeniDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Padualaan 14, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-2446
Sebastian Mildiner MoragaDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Padualaan 14, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6282-7394
Maaike WöstenDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Paul ElbersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence, Amsterdam Medical Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam Institute for Immunity and Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0447-6893
Patrick ThoralDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence, Amsterdam Medical Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam Institute for Immunity and Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6140-7195
Linda Wilhelmina Van LaakeDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5027-0661
Folkert Wouter AsselbergsThe National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), University College London Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1692-8669
Emmeke AartsDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Padualaan 14, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2432-7564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia affecting a large fraction of patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Predicting patients at risk of AF in the ICU is a challenging task and is not commonly practiced but could have clinical implications considering that AF is a proxy for poorer outcomes. Our goal is to develop a real-time AF prediction model using ICU numerical data to improve alarm quality, helping clinicians to identify at-risk patients and intervene before AF onset, thereby potentially improving clinical outcomes. Methods: We employed AmsterdamUMCdb, Europe's first openly accessible ICU dataset. The dataset includes static features, including demographics, as well as dynamic bedside monitoring data, like blood pressure and respiratory rate, along with detailed records of medication and fluid administration. To enhance generalizability across diverse ICU patients, we trained a long short-term memory (LSTM) model combined with a Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) approach. Model performance was tested on an imbalanced test set, reflective of the real-world ratio of AF to non-AF patients. Direct external validation was performed using the MIMIC-IV database to test generalizability across different clinical settings. Results: The LSTM-MAML model achieved an AUC of 0.92, accuracy of 0.89, and precision of 0.29 on the internal validation set. In external validation with MIMIC-IV, it showed near-equivalent performance with an AUC of 0.89, accuracy of 0.85, and precision of 0.18. Conclusions: The real-time prediction model demonstrated predictive value for AF and has potential for future clinical benefits. However, for clinical implementation, further refinement is necessary to improve its performance in identifying patients at risk for AF.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillation (AF)early predictionintensive-care unit (ICU)long short-term memory (LSTM)SHAP values

Identifiers

PMID42436815
PMCPMC13355586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.