ArticleJAMIA open2026
Real-time prediction of atrial fibrillation in intensive care unit: a meta-learning approach.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia affecting a large fraction of patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Predicting patients at risk of AF in the ICU is a challenging task and is not commonly practiced but could have clinical implications considering that AF is a proxy for poorer outcomes. Our goal is to develop a real-time AF prediction model using ICU numerical data to improve alarm quality, helping clinicians to identify at-risk patients and intervene before AF onset, thereby potentially improving clinical outcomes. Methods: We employed AmsterdamUMCdb, Europe's first openly accessible ICU dataset. The dataset includes static features, including demographics, as well as dynamic bedside monitoring data, like blood pressure and respiratory rate, along with detailed records of medication and fluid administration. To enhance generalizability across diverse ICU patients, we trained a long short-term memory (LSTM) model combined with a Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) approach. Model performance was tested on an imbalanced test set, reflective of the real-world ratio of AF to non-AF patients. Direct external validation was performed using the MIMIC-IV database to test generalizability across different clinical settings. Results: The LSTM-MAML model achieved an AUC of 0.92, accuracy of 0.89, and precision of 0.29 on the internal validation set. In external validation with MIMIC-IV, it showed near-equivalent performance with an AUC of 0.89, accuracy of 0.85, and precision of 0.18. Conclusions: The real-time prediction model demonstrated predictive value for AF and has potential for future clinical benefits. However, for clinical implementation, further refinement is necessary to improve its performance in identifying patients at risk for AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.