ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2026
Robotic partial nephrectomy is inching toward the gold standard for small renal masses-a narrative review.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Management of small renal masses has changed significantly since the concept of radical nephrectomy for kidney cancer was described in 1969. As improved imaging allowed the early detection of small renal masses, minimally invasive partial nephrectomies became the standard treatment to preserves kidney function. The DaVinci robotic platform allowed many of these surgeries to be performed robotically, with the aid of new technologies that refine dissection. The purpose of this review is to describe the progression of partial nephrectomy technique over time and its impact on patient outcomes. Methods: PubMed was searched for all studies tracking the change in proportion of partial nephrectomies based on surgical approach from 2000-2026. The search was limited to English language studies. Studies that did not describe the proportion of robotic partial nephrectomies were excluded. A non-systemic literature review was then performed using keywords associated with associated advances in surgical approach and technology. Key Content and Findings: Early partial nephrectomies were predominantly performed through open surgery. In the early 21st century there was a small growth in laparoscopic surgery, which was quickly overtaken by robotic partial nephrectomy after the introduction of the DaVinci robot in the early 2000s. Robotic partial nephrectomy would become the predominant surgical approach by the early 2010s in the United States. This trend would be mirrored internationally, albeit with slower adoption of the robotics. The predominance of robotic partial nephrectomy can be attributed to superior post-operative outcomes, mediated by the integration of new technology into the robotic platform. Conclusions: Partial nephrectomy has become a guideline recognized standard for managing small renal masses. The robotic approach has become favored due to superior post-operative outcomes mediated by advances in technology and surgical technique. Further advances are expected to refine the robotic partial nephrectomy, inching it towards the clinical "gold standard".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.