ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026
Digital simulation of kidney collecting system and stone: geometry and texture mapping.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digital simulation is the first step in many, virtual reality, computer vision, and automation pipelines. However, to our knowledge, no open source highly realistic three-dimensional (3D) models of a kidney with a textured collecting system exists. Herein we describe our technique for rendering a high-fidelity digital shadow of the human kidney collecting system with kidney stone. Methods: Using medical imaging data, iterative 3D modeling, and advanced texture mapping, an anatomically accurate and visually realistic kidney collecting system was produced. Similarly, we generated calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) and uric acid (UA) stones. The workflow included computed tomography (CT)-derived geometry correction, custom texture design and shader-based rendering. The structures were sent to twenty-three urologists who were given a Likert-rating scale to rate the fidelity of the renderings in terms of the kidney and stone, geometry and texture. Average, median and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the responses were calculated to characterize the responses and reliability. Results: Fifteen urologists responded to each question. The simulated collecting system was generally evaluated as realistic {median 4 [interquartile range (IQR): 3, 5]}. UA stone texture was significantly more realistic than COM texture [median: 4 (IQR: 4, 5) Conclusions: This work addresses a key gap in realistic anatomical modeling for ureteroscopy, which may support improved training and potentially enable simulation of kidney stone removal procedures. While the simulation was evaluated favorably especially for the UA stone, there is room for improvement of the urothelial mucosa, and texture of the renal papillae, and COM stone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.