Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42436765›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026

Comparison of three commercial sperm freezing media with regard to the influence on sperm motility, vitality and DNA fragmentation.

Emilia Lula Kruschel, Stefanie Steinert, Marta Agnieszka Godlewska, Gabriele Hahn, Katrin Laubis, Nala Luisa Blenck, Andrea Salzbrunn, Armin Soave, Stefan W Schneider, Kathrein von Kopylow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emilia Lula KruschelDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, Andrological Section, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefanie SteinertDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, Andrological Section, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Marta Agnieszka GodlewskaDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, Andrological Section, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Gabriele HahnDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, Andrological Section, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Katrin LaubisDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, Andrological Section, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Nala Luisa BlenckDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, Andrological Section, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Andrea SalzbrunnDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, Andrological Section, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Armin SoaveDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, Andrological Section, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan W SchneiderDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, Andrological Section, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Kathrein von KopylowDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, Andrological Section, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4362-7973

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sperm cryopreservation is of fundamental importance for the assisted reproductive techniques. To date, there is still no uniform standard for sperm cryopreservation in the reproductive medical laboratories, although the quality of cryopreserved human sperm is strongly influenced by the choice of the freezing medium. Literature on the comparison of commercial sperm cryomedia still shows variable results depending on the study design, the tests conducted, and the different study populations investigated. The aim of our study was therefore to determine which of the three most commonly used commercial cryopreservation media, Sperm Freeze (SF; FertiPro), Sperm Freezing Medium (SFM; Cooper Surgical, Origio), and TEST Yolk Buffer (TYB; Fujifilm, Irvine Scientific), in combination with a slow-freezing protocol, is best suited for freezing ejaculates from infertile patients. Methods: Ejaculate leftovers (>1 mL) from 60 patients (age 16-57 years; mean 34.9 years) from the clinical diagnostic of the patients from the Andrological Department at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf were collected over a period from November 2021 to May 2023. Each ejaculate rest was then divided into four portions of 250 µL, of which three were each frozen with one of three different commercial sperm cryomedia, SF, SFM and TYB. Frozen ejaculate portions were then thawed and analyzed with regard to the diagnostic sperm parameters motility, vitality and DNA integrity in comparison to the unfrozen (fresh) sample. To determine the motility of the sperm, a spermiogram was performed according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Sperm vitality was examined by means of eosin staining. Sperm DNA integrity was investigated on the basis of a direct DNA fragmentation test [terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay] and an indirect DNA fragmentation test [acridine orange (AO) staining]. DNA staining was analyzed applying the automated, microscope-based imaging platform ScanR (Olympus LS). Results: In the comparison of the three freezing media, TYB turned out to be the best regarding the sperm motility. In contrast, all three media performed equally in relation to the sperm vitality and preservation of sperm DNA integrity. Conclusions: Compared to SF and SFM, TYB can be recommended as the best medium for the cryopreservation of ejaculates from infertile patients. Nevertheless, since the ejaculates used for the analyses mostly came from infertile patients, results may not be representative for a "normal patient collective" and might therefore not be applicable, i.e., for sperm donors.

Indexed as

acridine orange (AO)DNA fragmentationSperm cryopreservationsperm freezing mediaterminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling assay (TUNEL)

Identifiers

PMID42436765
PMCPMC13355267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.