Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42436742›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2026

Adapting transformer-based encoder models for automated billing code assignment of current procedural terminology from pathology reports in multi-institutional settings.

Elijah Renner, Om Patel, Sean McOsker, Minh-Khang Le, Yunrui Lu, Louis J Vaickus, Anders Berg, Keluo Yao, Joshua Levy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elijah RennerThetford Academy, Thetford, VT, USA.
Om PatelDowningtown STEM Academy, Downingtown, PA, USA.
Sean McOskerProgram in Quantitative Biomedical Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Minh-Khang LeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Yunrui LuDivision of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Louis J VaickusDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Anders BergDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Keluo YaoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Joshua LevyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate pathology billing is crucial for financial sustainability, process optimization, and regulatory compliance. Current procedural terminology (CPT) codes 88300-88309 denote increasing complexity in gross and microscopic examination of surgical specimens, and correct assignment is critical to prevent misbilling, yet reports contain interpretive information subject to ambiguous assignment. Although machine learning methods have been developed for CPT code prediction, most fail to address challenges of integrating heterogeneous, variably structured reports across institutions with differing documentation practices. This study aims to advance machine learning approaches to leverage large-scale, diverse pathology report corpora and assess their adaptability across institutions. Transformer-based encoder models were initially fine-tuned on 59,923 cases from Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and further fine-tuned on 174,045 cases from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, where final performance in CPT code prediction was evaluated. This sequential fine-tuning strategy was compared against models trained solely on the secondary institution's data (single-stage) and against traditional bag-of-words machine learning approaches (Naive Bayes, Random Forest, XGBoost). The best-performing model, a sequentially fine-tuned SciBERT-Longformer, achieved a macro-F1 of 0.8912. Sequential fine-tuning consistently yielded improvements in F1 for rare CPT codes for which there exists limited training data. As validation, SHAP analyses were used to interpret model predictions and verify alignment between influential keywords and established CPT code terminology. Model predictions were ultimately shown to be efficient, explainable, and grounded in clinical knowledge, further supporting potential for adaptation to real-world settings. Sequential fine-tuning on varied pathology corpora improved coding performance, highlighting the potential of institution-specific transformer models to streamline billing, reduce administrative burden, and enhance reimbursement accuracy.

Indexed as

Current procedural terminologyLarge language modelsMulti-institutionalNatural language processingPathology reportsPretrainingTransfer Learning

Identifiers

PMID42436742
PMCPMC13355774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.