ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2026
Neural Representation Learning for Compact and Efficient Modeling of Monte Carlo Phase Space Data.
Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Monte Carlo (MC) simulations provide gold standard dose calculations in radiation therapy but generate large phase space (PHSP) files that limit clinical implementation. We developed NeRP-MC, the first neural representation learning approach for PHSP data modeling, and evaluated its ability to model particle distributions from minimal training data. Materials and Methods: We investigated proton PHSP modeling at 242 and 140 MeV. For both energies, a reference proton pencil beam PHSP containing 25 million particles was generated using TOPAS. A multi-layer perceptron with Fourier feature encoding was trained to predict particle energies from spatial and momentum inputs. We evaluated NeRP-MC in 3 scenarios: 1) compact energy modeling given full spatial and momentum information, 2) energy modeling from sparse PHSP data (1.25 million particles, 20-fold reduction), and 3) replacing the PHSP with parametric Gaussian spatial/momentum distributions and network-predicted energies conditioned on the Gaussian-sampled inputs. Validation used in-water dose distributions compared via gamma index analysis. Results: The trained network requires only 600 KB for storage versus 3 GB for the original PHSP and predicts 25 million particle energies in under 0.5 seconds on an NVIDIA A100 GPU. NeRP-MC generated energies showed close agreement with reference data across all 3 scenarios. Depth-dose profiles, lateral profiles, and penumbra regions were accurately reproduced. Gamma pass rates exceeded 99% at 3%/2 mm and 90% at the strictest 1%/1 mm criterion. Conclusion: NeRP-MC offers compact modeling and fast prediction of particle energies from particle spatial and momentum information and promises to replace the large-scale PHSP with a parametric Gaussian model of spatial and angular variables and the NeRP model of particle energy variables. NeRP-MC has the potential to advance MC simulation efficiency for radiation therapy through a substantial reduction in computational and storage requirements while maintaining dosimetric accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.