ArticleDEN open2027
Strangulated Ileus Caused by Clips Used for Closure of an Appendiceal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Perforation: A Case Report.
Article in DEN open, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perforation developing during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal lesions can necessitate halting of the procedure and performing emergency surgery. In some cases, conservative treatment of the perforation is possible using endoscopic clips or over-the-scope-clips (OTSCs). In the case presented herein, while perforation closure was successfully achieved with conventional through-the-scope clips (hereafter referred to as "conventional clips"), the patient developed ileus as a complication, necessitating emergency surgery. The patient was a 69-year-old man who developed strangulated ileus caused by conventional clips placed for closure of a bowel perforation developing after ESD for a lesion in the cecum. We placed several conventional clips and OTSCs to close the perforation and confirmed the absence of any leak at a second-look examination. However, 10 days later, the patient visited our emergency department complaining of abdominal pain. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed that a segment of the small intestine was drawn into the closing device, resulting in the development of strangulated ileus. We performed laparoscopic surgery and identified the conventional clips that had become caught in the small intestinal serosa/mesentery and led to the formation of a closed bowel loop and bowel obstruction. We released the loop without resection of the intestine. The damaged serosa and mesentery were sutured, and the patient was discharged on hospital day 8. Based on our experience, we suggest that the treating surgeon should bear in mind that even conventional clips used for perforation closure have the potential to grasp organs adjacent to the wall and cause obstruction and the development of symptoms after hospital discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.