ReviewCureus2026
Early Education on Intimate Partner Violence in Undergraduate Medical Training: A Narrative Review on Timing, Methods, and Clinical Preparedness.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intimate partner violence (IPV) encompasses physical, emotional, and sexual abuse within intimate relationships and is commonly encountered in clinical practice, affecting individuals across all backgrounds. Globally, healthcare settings represent a critical point of contact for individuals who have experienced intimate partner violence. IPV is associated with adverse health outcomes including depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, substance use disorders, traumatic brain injury, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Despite high prevalence and recommendations to routinely screen women of reproductive age, IPV screening rates remain inconsistent, highlighting the need to examine how IPV education is incorporated into medical training. This narrative review evaluates undergraduate medical education on IPV, focusing on timing, instructional methods, and impact of interventions on student preparedness. A search was conducted in PubMed and Embase for studies published between 2000 and 2025, from which eligible articles were selected for full-text review. Existing curricula use multimodal approaches, including didactic sessions, small-group discussions, and simulation-based training, but are often isolated, optional, and rarely reinforced longitudinally. While these approaches improve short-term knowledge and confidence, gaps remain in sustained preparedness and consistent screening practices. Current approaches to IPV education may overestimate preparedness by emphasizing self-reported, short-term confidence, while failing to evaluate whether skills are consistently applied in real-world clinical settings. Repeated exposure to trauma-informed IPV education during preclinical years may help normalize screening and strengthen recognition skills. Future strategies should prioritize longitudinal, community-based curricula that reinforce IPV screening and response across multiple stages of medical training to better prepare physicians for real-world patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.