ReviewEuropean urology open science2026
Postvoid Residual Thresholds Used to Define Chronic Urinary Retention: A Systematic Review.
Review in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context and Objective: Chronic urinary retention (CUR) is a clinically relevant but poorly defined urological condition, often assessed in the clinic using postvoid residual (PVR) volumes. The lack of consensus on the PVR threshold that defines CUR limits diagnostic consistency, clinical decision-making, and comparability of research findings. This review aims to systematically examine how CUR is defined in the current literature, focusing on the reported PVR thresholds. Evidence acquisition: In this systematic-narrative review, a search of five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) was conducted in August 2022 and December 2025. Eligible studies included randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews that defined CUR using a PVR threshold in adult patients. Evidence synthesis: A total of 4588 abstracts were screened across two searches, resulting in 14 inclusions. Eleven studies focused on patients with CUR due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. PVR thresholds for defining CUR varied between 150 ml and 1000 ml, with 300 ml being the most reported in 10 studies. Seven studies reported on patients who were able to void, three of which also reported on patients who were unable to void. The remaining seven studies did not report the voiding status of the participants. Four studies repeated the PVR measurements. Six studies used ultrasound or a bladder scan to measure PVR. Conclusions: This review highlights the inconsistency in the definitions and PVR thresholds used to define CUR in the literature. The available evidence was limited and heterogeneous, with substantial variation in study populations, voiding status, and measurement methods. Therefore, the current literature does not provide sufficient consistent evidence to support a single definitive PVR threshold for CUR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.