ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2026
Classifying schizophrenia patients and healthy individuals: Whole brain SPECT functional connectivity using support vector machine classification.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been used to characterize functional brain networks in disorders ranging from depression to schizophrenia. Like fMRI, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a technique which captures information about neurally linked blood flow activity through radioactive tracers. While a few SPECT studies in schizophrenia populations have been conducted along with fMRI based studies, research on SPECT data for individual subject classification is limited. We used an independent component analysis (ICA) approach to estimate covarying SPECT networks from our prior study. Results were then fed as input to a classifier model to evaluate accuracy of individual diagnostic prediction. Methods: 213 subjects (137 schizophrenia patients and 76 healthy controls) were used for the analysis. Classification input was based on loading parameters generated from spatially constrained ICA using a set of network priors derived from fMRI. Fifty-three SPECT components were estimated guided by the NeuroMark fMRI 1.0 template. We initially focused on a support vector machine (SVM) classifier given previous favorable fMRI-SVM results. We also evaluated performance of multiple classifiers post hoc. Results and conclusion: Surprisingly, linear SVM performed worse compared to random forest, logistic regression, voting, and multilayer perceptron. Linear SVM had a greater number of false negatives compared to the other classifier approaches. By contrast, random forest and logistic regression performed the highest, with an 88% sensitivity and 61% specificity (random forest), and 87% sensitivity and 68% specificity (logistic regression). These results demonstrate that other approaches such as random forest and logistic regressions should be further investigated for future SPECT studies, and coupled with sc-ICA, provide an improved understanding of aberrant functional networks in schizophrenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.