ArticleJPRAS open2026
Liposomal bupivacaine after reduction mammaplasty: is it worth the shot? A single-blind, breast-split randomized clinical trial.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Reduction mammaplasty is a common procedure to relieve symptoms of macromastia. Amid the ongoing opioid crisis, improving postoperative pain control with judicious opioid prescribing practices has become a clinical priority. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB; Exparel) is a long-acting local anesthetic that may reduce opioid requirements, though evidence supporting its use in breast reduction is limited. This study evaluated the efficacy of LB in reducing postoperative pain following reduction mammaplasty. Methods: In this prospective, single-blind, breast-split controlled trial, 32 adult female patients undergoing bilateral reduction mammaplasty were enrolled at a single academic center after IRB approval. Each breast received standard bupivacaine (SB; 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride); one side was randomly assigned to receive additional LB. Pain scores were recorded using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (0-10) twice daily on postoperative days (POD) 1 through 3. Pain scores between sides were analyzed using paired Results: The average patient age was 45.4 years (SD 14.4), with a mean BMI of 29.5 kg/m² (SD 4.3). No patients were lost to follow-up. Pain scores were lower on the LB side during POD1 and POD2. The greatest difference was noted on POD1 AM, with a mean reduction of -0.8 and median difference of -1 (p = 0.012). By POD3, pain scores equalized between sides. No adverse events or complications were observed. Conclusion: LB provided a modest reduction in pain scores during the first two postoperative days compared to standard bupivacaine. A more robust, adequately powered study is necessary to confirm the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.