ArticleAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2026
How Age and Race/Ethnicity Affect the Benefits of Mutual-Help Group Involvement for People With Alcohol Use Disorders: Findings From the PAL Study Cohorts.
Article in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMutual-help groups (MHGs) are generally effective for alcohol use disorders (AUDs), but how demographic characteristics affect the benefits of MHG involvement is largely unknown. This longitudinal study of adults with AUD examined whether age and race/ethnicity moderated associations between MHG involvement and alcohol outcomes.
methodsData were from the pooled Peer ALternatives for Addiction 2015 and 2021 Cohorts (N = 1152), which adopted parallel designs and measures. Eligibility criteria included lifetime AUD and past-30-day 12-step and/or second-wave MHG attendance. Participants were surveyed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months; surveys assessed MHG involvement (5-item scale) and alcohol outcomes (i.e., abstinence, alcohol problems, heavy drinking). Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) models tested effects for MHG involvement, demographics, and their interactions on outcomes at next survey.
resultsIn adjusted models, lagged MHG involvement consistently predicted better outcomes and showed significant interactions with both age (for alcohol problems and heavy drinking) and race/ethnicity (for alcohol problems). Follow-up analyses showed that MHG involvement was protective against alcohol problems for those aged 30-59 and 60+ (ORs = 0.35-0.37, ps < 0.05) but nonsignificant among those 18-29 (OR = 2.39, p = 0.10); similarly, MHG involvement was predictive of fewer drinking days for those 30-59 and 60+ (IRRs = 0.02-0.11, ps < 0.001) but nonsignificant among those 18-29 (IRR = 1.05, p = 0.90). Meanwhile, MHG involvement was protective against alcohol problems for Non-Hispanic White participants (OR = 0.34, p < 0.001) but nonsignificant among those of any other race/ethnicity (OR = 1.71, p = 0.20).
conclusionsMHG involvement may confer diminished benefits for young adults and people of color. These subgroups may benefit from tailored meetings and/or alternative activities that foster peer support for recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.