ArticlePhysiological reports2026
Impact of United States marine corps recruit training on the stress response and menstrual function in female marine recruits.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the physiological stress response and menstrual cycle (MC) function in Marine recruits during United States Marine Corps Recruit Training at the Marine Corps Recruit Depot in San Diego, CA. Female recruits (n = 120) completed pre- and post-RT MC surveys. Saliva samples were collected at 6 timepoints (pre-RT, weeks 1, 4, 7, 10, post-RT) and analyzed for stress biomarkers. Urine samples were collected pre-RT, 5 days per week during RT, and post-RT to assess sex hormone metabolites. Linear mixed-effects models assessed time effects (p < 0.05). Pre-RT sAA levels were higher than weeks 4 (p < 0.001), 7 (p < 0.001), and 10 (p = 0.003). Week 1 sAA levels were greater than week 7 (p = 0.049) and post-RT sAA levels were greater than week 4 (p = 0.011), 7 (p < 0.001), and 10 (p = 0.046). Cortisol at weeks 1 (p = 0.004) and 4 (p < 0.001) was greater than week 10. Before RT, 85% reported regular MCs; during RT, 53% reported irregularity. Urine measures indicated 92% experienced MC disruption, 87.5% within the first cycle. Recruits experienced heightened stress early in RT but adapted as training progressed. Most recruits exhibited MC irregularities, with disruption occurring in the first cycle, indicating heightened hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis sensitivity to military training stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.