ArticleBMC psychology2026
Leveraging social media footprints for predicting college student anxiety: a machine learning approach.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnxiety is one of the most prevalent mental health concerns among college students worldwide, yet traditional assessment methods relying on self-report questionnaires are time-consuming, susceptible to response bias, and difficult to scale. Social media platforms, which students use extensively, generate rich behavioral and linguistic data that may reflect underlying psychological states. This study investigates whether passively collected social media footprints are associated with anxiety scores among college students and may support the prediction of anxiety-related patterns.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we surveyed 3,211 students across 11 universities in four provinces of China using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), yielding 2,368 valid responses (α = 0.918, KMO = 0.838). With informed consent, we collected 83,968 Weibo posts from participants' public social media accounts. After rigorous preprocessing, 56,060 posts from 1,316 users were retained. We extracted multi-dimensional features spanning linguistic, emotional, cognitive, behavioral, and temporal dimensions. Four machine learning models-Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and SVR-were trained and compared. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values were used for model interpretation.
resultsThe Random Forest model achieved the best predictive performance on the test set (R² = 0.77, RMSE = 13.41, MAPE = 25.94%, MSLE = 0.087). SHAP-based interpretation identified grade level, professionalism, emotional expression, risk-related language, curiosity index, emotional tone, and word count as major features contributing to the model. These features align with established psychological dimensions of anxiety symptomatology, including emotional, cognitive, and behavioral indicators.
conclusionsPublic social-media signals were associated with SAS anxiety scores in this consenting, active Weibo-user sample and supported cross-sectional score prediction within the study context. The proposed pipeline offers a transparent, reproducible, and privacy-conscious approach to estimate cross-sectional anxiety-related patterns from publicly available social media data. These findings demonstrate the potential for integrating computational approaches with psychological assessment for research on anxiety-related behaviors and digital phenotyping among college students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.