ArticlePatient safety in surgery2026
Safety of the harmonic scalpel versus conventional "clamp-and-tie" approach for intraoperative bleeding control during thyroidectomy: a surgeon's experience in 60 consecutive cases.
Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-thyroidectomy complications including hypocalcemia, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, and cervical hematoma remain important safety concerns. Although the harmonic scalpel improves operative efficiency, evidence regarding its impact on patient safety outcomes remains limited.
methodsIn this prospective observational cohort study, 60 patients undergoing open thyroidectomy were allocated to harmonic scalpel (n = 30) or clamp and tie (n = 30) groups. The primary endpoints were safety outcomes, including hypocalcemia, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, postoperative hematoma, surgical site infection, and composite complication rates. Secondary endpoints included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, drain output, postoperative pain, and length of hospital stay. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
resultsUse of the harmonic scalpel was associated with a significant reduction in overall complications compared with the conventional technique (13.3% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.04). Transient hypocalcemia occurred less frequently in the harmonic scalpel group, accompanied by significantly higher postoperative calcium levels at 24 and 48 h. No recurrent laryngeal nerve injury or postoperative hematoma was observed in the harmonic scalpel group, although differences were not statistically significant. In addition to improved safety outcomes, harmonic scalpel use resulted in shorter operative duration, substantially reduced intraoperative blood loss, lower postoperative drain volumes, decreased pain scores, and reduced length of hospital stay.
conclusionThe harmonic scalpel was associated with improved operative efficiency and a lower overall complication burden without increasing major safety-related complications. Larger randomized multicenter studies are required to confirm these findings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.