ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2026
Analytical and clinical validation of a novel proximity extension assay-based plasma biomarker panel in a cohort of prevalent neurodegenerative dementias.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlood-based biomarkers are increasingly recognized as promising tools for the diagnosis and monitoring of neurodegenerative diseases, offering a minimally invasive alternative to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing. We evaluated the analytical performance and clinical utility of the Olink Target 48 Neurodegeneration panel, a novel multiplex proteomic platform based on the proximity extension assay (PEA) technology, in a large, clinically diverse dementia cohort.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed plasma samples from 238 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies, frontotemporal dementia, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal degeneration, along with 65 healthy controls, quantifying 41 proteins in each sample. We assessed analytical performance using intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation, evaluated diagnostic accuracy through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and investigated associations between biomarker levels, clinical severity measures, and pathology-specific CSF biomarkers for AD and Lewy body pathology (LBP) using general linear models.
resultsThe platform quantified 32 proteins with variable analytical performance; nine were excluded due to poor detectability. Strong correlations were observed between PEA-based measurements and established immunoassays for plasma pTau217, NEFL, and GFAP (all p < 0.001). Plasma pTau217 demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy for AD, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) exceeding 0.91 against all comparison groups. Novel ratios combining NEFL with markers of immune function or synaptic integrity (NEFL/ITGB2, NEFL/ITGAM, NEFL/SCG2) achieved AUCs exceeding 0.93 for discriminating patients from controls, significantly outperforming NEFL alone (all p < 0.001). Thirteen proteins, spanning markers of neuroaxonal damage, myelin-associated processes, and immune function (i.e., Abeta40, Abeta42, BMP7, CLSTN3, ENO2, KLK8, MMP10, NEFL, NPTXR, OMG, RTN4R, SCG2, SDC4, all p < 0.01) showed significant independent associations with disease stage as measured by the Clinical Dementia Rating scale. Four proteins (i.e., pTau217, GFAP, SYT1, and SDC4) were significantly associated with AD pathology, while three (ENO2, ITGAM, and ITGB2) showed significant associations with LBP (all p < 0.05).
conclusionsThis multiplex platform provides multiplex biomarker measurements with potential utility for AD diagnosis and disease staging across neurodegenerative disorders. These findings support further validation studies for its implementation in clinical and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.