ArticleArthritis research & therapy2026
Evaluating clinical heterogeneity in relapsing polychondritis through unsupervised cluster analysis.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs a rare autoimmune disease, relapsing polychondritis (RP) exhibits individual variations in clinical manifestations, treatment response and prognosis. To date, no biomarkers have been implemented to clinical practice.This study aimed to apply cluster analysis to identify the clinical phenotype, clarify their prognosis predictor, and monitor treatment decisions to improve the outcomes of patients.
methodsA total of 135 RP patients hospitalized in two centers from January 2005 to December 2024 were involved in the study.The K-means clustering algorithm was used as the core clustering tool. The optimal number of clusters(K = 3)was determined through comprehensive evaluation using the Elbow Method and Silhouette Analysis.
resultsCluster analysis identified 3 RP phenotypes.Cluster 1 comprised 45 cases(33.3%),characterized by a hyperinflammatory state and predominant respiratory involvement; Cluster 2 included 11 cases (8.1%),defined by severe and multi-organ involvement Cluster 3 which accounted for 79 cases (58.52%), more than half of the cohort, was predominantly male and exhibited the most favorable prognosis.In contrast, Clusters 1 and 2 were associated with the highest rates of clinical deterioration.
conclusionsThis study confirms that relapsing polychondritis is not a single-dimensional disease, but a clinical syndrome with significant heterogeneity. Random forest analysis further identifies that systemic inflammation markers (CRP, CAR, ESR) and sensory organ involvement (hearing impairment and inner ear dysfunction) as the most critical driving factors for distinguishing these subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.