ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2026
Integrating untargeted metabolomics and machine learning to reveal an aberration of sphingolipid metabolism in cardiometabolic HFpEF.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiometabolic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a high-risk phenotype primarily driven by metabolic syndrome, with a significantly increased incidence and risk of adverse outcomes. A fundamental reason for this is the lack of early clinical diagnosis. As a tool capable of accurately capturing pathophysiological states, metabolomics provides a critical entry point for addressing this issue; however, studies focusing on the metabolic characteristics of this population remain limited.
methodsThis study integrated a clinical cohort and untargeted metabolomics to compare serum metabolic profiles between patients with cardiometabolic HFpEF and those with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Baseline characteristics were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM). Differential metabolites were identified by untargeted metabolomics, followed by KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. Machine-learning approaches were further applied to screen candidate metabolites with potential diagnostic efficacy, and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) together with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to evaluate phenotype association and feature contribution. In an independent clinical cohort, total sphingomyelin (SM) levels were assessed by ELISA as an external evaluation strategy based on clinical applicability.
resultsDifferential metabolites between the two groups were mainly enriched in sphingolipid metabolism and glycerophospholipid metabolism pathways. Through multi-method screening, C24:1 Sphingomyelin was identified as a candidate metabolite with potential diagnostic efficacy. The co-expression module containing C24:1 Sphingomyelin was significantly correlated with NT-proBNP, a key biomarker of heart failure, and SHAP analysis indicated that C24:1 Sphingomyelin contributed substantially to the classification model. In the external cohort, total SM levels were associated with disease status, suggesting the potential clinical association of sphingolipid-related signals.
conclusionThis study preliminarily characterized the metabolic features distinguishing cardiometabolic HFpEF from MetS alone, suggesting that sphingolipid dysregulation is associated with the development and progression of this phenotype. Among the identified metabolites, C24:1 Sphingomyelin was identified as a candidate metabolite with potential diagnostic performance, and SM showed potential clinical applicability. These findings provide new clues for biomarker discovery and preliminary clinical translational exploration in cardiometabolic HFpEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.