Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42436512›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Advancing team-based care in private practices: a case study of a public-private hybrid model.

Coralie Darcis, Emmett Harrison, Haizhen Mou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Coralie DarcisJohnson Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. coralie.darcis@usask.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1682-4402
Emmett HarrisonDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Haizhen MouJohnson Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite widespread enthusiasm for team-based care models, adoption remains a challenge across Canadian jurisdictions, especially in private practices. The transformation of primary care demands innovative approaches that reconcile physician autonomy with the systemic need for collaborative, team-based care. This article examines an innovative public-private hybrid model in which publicly funded non-physician team members are integrated into a private clinic. It offers insights into how such reconciliation might be achieved.

methodsThis study draws on a case study of a pilot project involving a primary care private practice transitioning to team-based care in Canada. Three qualitative data collection methods were employed: document analysis, semi-structured interviews (n = 27), and non-participatory observations (six days). A manual thematic analysis of the data was conducted, results were triangulated, and the coding system was refined through research team discussions.

resultsFindings highlight both the benefits and challenges of hybrid models as a pathway for primary care reform. Benefits include enabling transition to team-based care by addressing resource constraints, preserving core aspects of family physicians' professional autonomy, and incorporating patient-centered thinking within organizations typically oriented toward efficiency and sustainability. Challenges include physician distrust of public authorities, incompatibility with the fee-for-service payment model, and structural and operational barriers.

conclusionsThis research offers insights into how incremental reforms can leverage existing private infrastructure while advancing collaborative care. These findings may inform strategies in jurisdictions where primary care remains heavily reliant on independent practitioners. Future research should examine the conditions under which such models can be sustained and scaled, and how they reshape professional roles, governance, and accountability in primary care.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamPrimary Health CarePrivate PracticePublic-Private Sector PartnershipsCanadaHumansInterviews as TopicModels, OrganizationalOrganizational Case StudiesPatient-Centered CarePilot ProjectsProfessional AutonomyQualitative ResearchHealthcare policyHealthcare system transformationHybrid care modelsPrimary careTeam-based care

Identifiers

PMID42436512
PMCPMC13640269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.