ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Anatomical analysis of the posterior elbow joint capsule and small muscle bundle deep to the triceps brachii: a combined cadaveric and in vivo study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRestricted elbow flexion sometimes persists even after stretching the triceps brachii. Although prior descriptions have noted that a small muscle bundle is located between the posterior elbow joint capsule and the triceps brachii, its anatomical relationship with surrounding muscles and dynamic changes during forearm rotation remain unclear. We hypothesized that the small muscle bundle separates from the triceps and contributes to forearm rotation. This study aimed to clarify the anatomical structure of the small muscle bundle and its dynamic changes during forearm rotation.
methodsWe analyzed 19 elbow specimens from 16 Japanese cadavers, donated to the Department of Anatomy, Institute of Science Tokyo, to identify the small muscle bundle covering the joint capsule. One specimen was excluded because of severe osteophytes, leaving 18 specimens randomly allocated to three groups (10, 3, and 5 specimens in the macroscopic examination, intramuscular nerve distribution examination, and histological examination groups, respectively). Additionally, we investigated 10 elbows of five healthy volunteers to evaluate dynamic changes in the small muscle bundle and joint capsule using ultrasonography during forearm rotation.
resultsAnatomically, deep to the triceps brachii, a small muscle bundle covering the posterior elbow joint capsule was identified. The small muscle bundle was continuous laterally with the anconeus muscle and was separated from the triceps by loose connective tissue. The small muscle bundle and the anconeus were innervated by the same branches of the radial nerve. Ultrasonically, the small muscle bundle was found to be significantly thicker during forearm supination (6.0 ± 1.4 mm) than pronation (4.1 ± 1.0 mm; p = 0.002), and the distance between the olecranon fossa and the posterior edge of the joint capsule was significantly shorter during supination (8.9 ± 1.1 mm) than pronation (9.6 ± 1.1 mm; p = 0.023).
conclusionsThe small muscle bundle formed a muscular complex with the anconeus and was distinct from the triceps. The small muscle bundle deep to the triceps may act during forearm rotation, affecting the posterior elbow joint capsule. These anatomical and ultrasonographic findings may contribute to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of restricted elbow flexion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.