ArticleBMC veterinary research2026
Antimicrobial use, resistance awareness, and biosecurity practices among poultry and aquaculture farmers in Nigeria: a cross-sectional KAP survey.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a growing threat to food production systems. In Nigeria, poultry and aquaculture sectors face heightened vulnerability due to high disease burdens, frequent antimicrobial use, and variable biosecurity practices. This study assessed AMR-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among value-chain respondents across four Nigerian states.
methodsA cross-sectional KAP survey was conducted in January 2025 among 183 respondents across Anambra, Akwa Ibom, Kano, and Kwara states using multi-stage sampling. Data were collected via structured face-to-face interviews and analysed using Chi-square tests, Spearman's correlation, and binary logistic regression.
resultsMost respondents were aged 35-44 years (40.44%) with tertiary education having 80.33%. Disease incidence was high (84.15%), with bacterial infections most common (39.61%, n = 154). Antimicrobial use was high (92.90%), primarily for treatment (87.06% of users), with 22.35% self-prescribing. AMR awareness was reported by 71.58%, mainly from veterinary officers (87.02%) and social media (48.09%) among AMR-aware respondents (n = 131). Awareness was significantly associated with education level (χ²=57.16, df = 3, p < 0.001) and inversely correlated with use frequency (ρ=-0.279, p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression identified education as the strongest predictor; secondary-educated farmers were 98% less likely to be AMR-aware than tertiary-educated (OR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.00-0.07, p < 0.001). Biosecurity awareness was high (72.68%) but training coverage was low (53.55%; χ²=13.46, df = 1, p < 0.001).
conclusionsWidespread antimicrobial use, moderate AMR awareness, and inconsistent biosecurity practices were identified. Education was the strongest predictor of AMR awareness, underscoring the need for non-formal AMR communication strategies. Feed millers, sellers, and allied value-chain actors should be incorporated into national AMR stewardship programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.