Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42436499›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2026

Perceived effectiveness of factors and intervention strategies for promoting evidence-based policymaking in Japan: a cross-sectional survey among policymakers, researchers and knowledge brokers.

Yuko Arimura, Yuko Yanagawa, Shota Kiuchi, Chikoto Suzuki, Haruka Matsuyama, Hinako Wakabayashi, Hisaya Tomori, Kenji Takehara, Sonoko Sensaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuko ArimuraThink Tank for Children and Families, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuko YanagawaDepartment of Social Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Shota KiuchiDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Chikoto SuzukiThink Tank for Children and Families, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruka MatsuyamaDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Hinako WakabayashiDepartment of Medical Technology Implementation and Social Impact , National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Hisaya TomoriThink Tank for Children and Families, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji TakeharaThink Tank for Children and Families, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Sonoko SensakiThink Tank for Children and Families, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan. sensaki-s@ncchd.go.jp.

Funding

JST RISTEX JPMJRS22B3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based policymaking (EBPM) improves the quality of decision-making and ensures that necessary policies reach the populations who need them. Although EBPM-promoting factors have been conceptually explored, interventions that comprehensively address these factors remain under-investigated. Through qualitative research, we previously identified 25 factors that promote EBPM. Thus, this study aimed to (1) evaluate the perceived effectiveness of factors that promote EBPM and (2) assess the perceived effectiveness of interventions designed to address these factors.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in Japan among three stakeholder groups: policymakers, researchers and knowledge brokers (KBs). Participants assessed the perceived effectiveness of the 25 factors and 75 corresponding intervention strategies. The mean scores were calculated for each factor, and the proportion of respondents who considered each intervention effective within its respective factor was determined.

resultsOf the 154 invited participants, 55 completed the survey, including policymakers (n = 15), researchers (n = 25) and KBs (n = 15). The highest-rated factor was "organizing and disseminating leverageable evidence and data" (mean = 4.53), which included the intervention "development of data infrastructure easily utilizable by researchers while ensuring personal information protection", selected as effective by 78.2% of the respondents. The second highest-rated factor was "enhancing the knowledge and skills of policymakers and researchers in policymaking processes, EBPM, and research" (mean = 4.37). Within this factor, two interventions shared the highest selection rate (72.3%): "establishment of an in-ministry training system enabling policymakers to acquire essential skills regardless of department" and "development and provision of EBPM-related educational content for professional organizations (academic societies) and policymakers".

conclusionsThis study identified the perceived effectiveness of 25 EBPM-promoting factors and 75 related interventions in the Japanese policymaking context on the basis of input from policymakers, researchers and KBs. These findings provide a foundation for the implementation of strategies by outlining practical interventions. The descriptive trends in perceived effectiveness across stakeholders suggest that implementation should reflect each group's priorities, roles and constraints. This study contributes to EBPM literature by systematically linking factors with interventions and demonstrating how stakeholder perspectives differ, thereby strengthening the basis for promoting EBPM in practice.

Indexed as

Administrative PersonnelDecision MakingEvidence-Based PracticeHealth PolicyPolicy MakingResearch PersonnelAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInformation DisseminationJapanMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesEvidence-based policymakingKnowledge brokersPolicymakerResearcher

Identifiers

PMID42436499
PMCPMC13644055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.