ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2026
Deep learning-based classification of gh-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumors granulation patterns using H&E-stained histopathology.
Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate classification of granulation patterns in growth hormone-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (GH-PitNETs) is clinically essential but traditionally dependent on labor-intensive immunohistochemistry (IHC). To address this, we developed the Cross-Attention Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor Network (CA-PITNET), a deep learning model for automated subtyping directly from routine H&E-stained whole-slide images (WSIs). Utilizing 95 GH-PitNETs WSIs (54,610 patches) and 36 nonfunctioning PitNET WSIs (39,590 patches), the model was evaluated on two tasks: distinguishing GH-PitNETs from nonfunctioning PitNETs (Task I) and differentiating densely from sparsely granulated GH-PitNETs (Task II). Following staining normalization and rigorous validation, CA-PITNET demonstrated exceptional diagnostic accuracy. For Task I, CA-PITNET achieved patient-level AUCs of 0.948 (95% CI: 0.854-1.000; internal validation, n = 48) and 0.948 (95% CI: 0.837-1.000; external test, n = 33), with accuracy of 0.938 and 0.909, respectively. For Task II, patient-level AUCs were 0.935 (95% CI: 0.890-1.000; internal validation, n = 38) and 0.875 (95% CI: 0.670-1.000; external test, n = 25), with accuracy of 0.895 and 0.840, respectively. Generated heatmaps precisely localized diagnostic regions, highlighting diagnostically relevant regions consistent with pathologist-reviewed areas. This model is designed to augment the pathological workflow by improving the subtyping efficiency of GH-PitNETs, serving as a valuable adjunct to the standard IHC-based classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.