ArticleBMC health services research2026
Health and social care workers perceptions of and experiences with virtual peer support: a qualitative study applying the Levesque Framework.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the initial years of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a rapid growth in virtual peer support interventions for health and social care workers. While these were often positively evaluated initially, there has been little research on their ongoing utility in the post-COVID response context, characterized by healthcare worker shortages and rising healthcare demands. This paper applies the Levesque Framework on access to healthcare to explore health and social care workers perspectives and experiences of virtual peer support services.
methodsNine online focus groups were held with 52 health and social care workers in British Columbia, Canada. Transcripts were analyzed using a mixed inductive and deductive approach to reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsMost participants were unaware of existing services but favourable to the idea of virtual peer support initiatives, despite some skepticism that early interventions could meet current needs. Engaging in mental healthcare was viewed as acceptable, but participants wanted assurances of cultural safety and to be able to engage with peers from similar social locations. Health and social care workers noted that time and energy constraints restricted access and had concerns about confidentiality and data security.
conclusionsVirtual peer support interventions must evolve to meet the current mental health needs of health and social care workers. This includes ensuring services are designed with a diverse workforce in mind and are proactive in assuring confidentiality and data security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.