ArticleBMC nursing2026
Compassion fatigue and its associated factors among clinical nurses: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the prevalence of compassion fatigue among clinical nurses in Xinjiang, China, and to identify factors associated with CF, thereby providing scientific evidence for developing targeted interventions to safeguard nurses' occupational health.
designA cross-sectional study conducted in accordance with the STROBE guidelines.
settingTertiary, secondary and primary hospitals located in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
participantsA total of 544 registered clinical nurses were enrolled using convenience sampling between September 2025 and October 2025.
main outcome measuresThe level of compassion fatigue was measured using the Chinese version of the Compassion Fatigue Scale-Short Scale (C-CFSS). Univariate analysis and multivariate linear regression were used to identify associated factors.
resultsThe overall compassion fatigue score for the 544 nurses was (56.43 ± 25.12) points. Comparisons of compassion fatigue scores across different departments, professional titles, years of nursing experience in the current department, and receipt of relevant training revealed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Multivariate linear regression analysis indicated that department type, length of service in the current department, and receipt of relevant training were the primary factors associated with nurses' compassion fatigue (R²=0.321, adjusted R²=0.310, P < 0.001).
conclusionCompassion fatigue levels among the participating nurses were moderate. Nurses in intensive care and oncology departments exhibited a higher risk of compassion fatigue, and those lacking relevant training or having longer tenure in their current department experienced more pronounced fatigue. Within this sample, a dual approach of individual empowerment and organizational support may be associated with lower compassion fatigue, improved nursing care quality, and enhanced professional well-being for nurses. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.