ArticleBMC medical education2026
Interventional radiology knowledge among family medicine residents in Türkiye: a national cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterventional radiology (IR) provides minimally invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and is increasingly integrated into routine clinical care. Family physicians play a key role in recognizing indications for IR and referring patients appropriately; however, their level of knowledge regarding IR remains uncertain.
aimsTo assess the knowledge, awareness, and perceptions of interventional radiology among family medicine residents in Türkiye and to evaluate factors associated with knowledge levels.
methodsThis cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among family medicine residents between August and October 2023 using a structured 21-item online questionnaire. The survey assessed sociodemographic characteristics, exposure to IR training, and knowledge of IR procedures. Knowledge scores were calculated using ten items. Statistical analyses were performed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, and chi-square tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsA total of 413 residents participated in the study. Overall, 60.6% of participants reported having an adequate level of knowledge regarding interventional radiology (IR), whereas only 25.5% stated that they directly referred patients to IR units. Commonly performed procedures, such as image-guided biopsy and drainage, were correctly identified by most participants; however, misconceptions were noted regarding several other interventional procedures. Residents who had completed clinical rotations associated with IR, particularly in cardiology and obstetrics and gynecology, demonstrated higher knowledge scores compared with those without such experience.
conclusionsFamily medicine residents demonstrated moderate awareness of interventional radiology, with knowledge gaps remaining in specific procedural areas. Clinical exposure through rotations may improve understanding. Incorporating structured IR education into residency training may enhance appropriate referral practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.