ArticleBMC medical education2026
Improving international medical students' communication skills in psychosomatic care through a communication training seminar: a natural language processing-based analysis.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInternational students face numerous challenges in both their academic and social lives when relocating to a new country for their university studies. The foreign language can have an impact on international medical students' performance in patient encounters. Particularly in the context of psychosocial medicine, a deficiency in communication skills can negatively impact the doctor-patient-relationship. This is the first study that uses natural language processing (NLP) as well as traditional rating scales to assess the improvement of international students' communication skills after attending a communication training seminar.
methodsN = forty-two international students participated in the study, which followed a pre-post-design. Diagnostic interviews with standardized patients (SP) were videotaped before and after the three-day training seminar, which was comprised of short lectures and communication trainings with SPs regarding the topic of psychosomatic medicine. Transcripts of diagnostic interviews were analyzed with NLP. Videotaped clinical encounters were assessed by three raters with binary and global rating instruments. For the comparison between pre- and post-assessment of all NLP communication parameters and rating results, two-way ANOVAs and Wilcoxon tests were calculated, respectively.
resultsNLP communication parameter results showed a decrease in talk-turns, interruptions, number of questions and talking over, and an increase in talk-turn-length in post-assessment compared to pre-assessment. There were no significant pre-post changes observed in binary checklist results. Significant pre-post changes were observed in global rating score and ratings from global rating domains 'interview structure' and 'verbal expression'.
conclusionInternational students significantly improved their communication style in psychosomatic medicine towards a more patient-centered approach. Changes in NLP communication parameters and improved interview style and verbal expression suggest that international students may have listened to patients more carefully. Furthermore, NLP has shown to be a viable tool to evaluate communication parameters in a doctor-patient-relationship and assess the effectiveness of communication training for international students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.