ArticleBMC oral health2026
Adhesive bonding to dentin in aging and diabetes: a scoping review of substrate-related changes and bonding outcomes.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAging and diabetes mellitus are associated with structural and biochemical changes in dentin, including altered collagen organization, dentinal sclerosis, tubule occlusion, mineral changes, and, in some contexts, increased non-enzymatic collagen glycation. These substrate changes may influence the performance and durability of adhesive restorative materials. However, the extent to which bonding outcomes can be directly attributed to advanced glycation end products (AGEs) remains uncertain, as AGE levels are rarely measured in adhesive studies.
methodsThis scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and was reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from inception to December 1, 2025. Eligible studies evaluated bond strength, interfacial morphology, microleakage, mineral content, or remineralization in dentin affected by aging, diabetes, or experimental glycation. Study selection and data charting were independently conducted by two reviewers.
resultsOf the 2615 records identified, 16 primary experimental studies met the inclusion criteria, most of which were in vitro investigations using extracted human teeth. Fifteen studies reported bond strength outcomes, and two assessed microleakage. Only four of the included studies directly evaluated diabetic dentin, and these studies generally reported reduced bond strength, particularly in type 1 diabetes. Most of the included studies evaluated age-related dentin, and the findings were heterogeneous, with many contemporary adhesives showing minimal differences between young and aged dentin. None of the included studies directly quantified AGE levels in dentin before adhesive testing.
conclusionDentin alterations associated with aging and diabetes may influence adhesive performance; however, the available evidence is heterogeneous and does not allow these effects to be directly attributed to AGE accumulation. Therefore, aging and diabetes should be interpreted as distinct dentin-modifying contexts rather than equivalent AGE-mediated substrates. Further studies incorporating biochemical assessment of dentin, participant-level clinical variables, and standardized durability testing are needed. SCOPING REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol for this scoping review was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) on 16th January 2026 ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JWA6H ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.