Trial reportBMC oral health2026
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of horizontal auto-augmentation of the anterior mandible using a single-site surgical technique prior to delayed implant placement: a case series.
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06727591 (Evaluation of Horizontal Anterior Mandibular Augmentation With Split Bone Block Technique From the Chin), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Horizontal Anterior Mandibular Augmentation With Split Bone Block Technique From the Chin
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInsufficient bone width is a common obstacle when placing dental implants. Numerous methods have been devised to enhance bone thickness. Autogenous bone is considered the benchmark material owing to its superior properties. The split bone block technique showed favorable results in bone gain, although donor site morbidity and the need for a second surgical site were major concerns. The study aimed to assess bone augmentation in the anterior mandible, using the symphysis as both the donor and recipient site, while the original technique required two surgeries. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis prospective, single-center, formal consecutive case series study focused on outcomes and involved 11 patients, each having a bone width of less than 4 mm in the anterior mandibular area. Patients underwent a procedure for horizontal ridge augmentation, with implants being placed after a four-month interval. The study assessed the healing of the surgical site, reported complications, and measured pain levels using a visual analogue scale. It evaluated bone gain in width, primary stability, secondary stability of implants, short-term implant success, and augmented bone stability.
resultsThe current study revealed postoperative swelling occurred in 45.5% of patients, while hematoma and flap dehiscence were each observed twice. Visual Analog Scale pain scores decreased over two weeks (P < 0.001). Mean radiographic bone width increased from (3.27 ± 0.80 mm) preoperatively to (5.88 ± 0.82 mm) at 4 months (P < 0.001). Furthermore, mean implant stability quotient scores improved from 72.80 (3.94) to 88.90 (2.10) (P < 0.001). The short-term implant success was 90.9%, and the mean linear augmented bone stability was 88.41% ± 6.24% (median: 90.57%), with individual values ranging from a minimum of 74.39% to a maximum of 94.57%.
conclusionsThe findings of this preliminary case series suggest that the auto-augmentation technique from the mandibular symphysis is a technically feasible protocol for horizontal ridge augmentation. By confining the surgery to a single localized window, it achieves adequate bone gain while minimizing donor-site trauma and optimizing patient recovery profiles.
trial registrationThe trial was registered on 12/09/2024 at clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT06727591).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.