ArticleBMC primary care2026
Facilitators of good consultations in primary health care clinics in Botswana: a qualitative study of patients' and doctors' views.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe behaviours and attributes of doctors affect the quality of consultations. Although good consultations improve the quality of care, there is a dearth of evidence on factors that facilitate good consultations.
aimThe aim of the study was to explore factors that facilitate good consultations in Botswana public primary healthcare (PHC) clinics from the perspective of doctors and patients.
settingWe conducted the study in public (PHC) clinics in four health districts of Botswana. Patients with a wide range of acute and chronic diseases sought health care from these clinics. Nurses, pharmacists, and non-specialist doctors were some of the healthcare (HCWs) who gave services to these patients.
methodsThis was a qualitative study in which consenting adult participants (doctors and patients) with consultation experience were purposively selected to ensure variety in age, gender, work experience, place of residence, education and employment status. Participants were recruited from public PHC clinics in several health districts in Botswana. Audiotaped semi-structured interviews were used to collect data, until saturation. Data were analysed for themes.
resultsSeventeen doctors and 32 patients participated in this study. Thematic analysis of the data showed that participants thought the facilitators of good consultations were, creating a conducive environment for the consultation, providing enough time for the consultation, continuity of care, effective communication, and creating an environment to maintain confidentiality.
conclusionThe facilitators of good consultations included creating rapport between doctors and patients, improving the ambience of the consultation rooms, ensuring continuity of care, maintaining effective and mutually acceptable communication, and satisfying patients' desire for the confidentiality of consultations. On deep reflection, we can see that these facilitators are subject to central government, local government, clinic, and individual level factors. These factors interact with each other and are subsumed in a complex interactive health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.