ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Whole genome sequence-based comparative genomics reveals preliminary genomic features of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis phage type 1 and phage type 4 strains from EnteroBase.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhole Genome Sequencing (WGS) enables detailed characterization of circulating and emerging bacterial strains. Although tens of thousands of Salmonella genomes have been acquired over the years, analyses of the genomic differences between strains of different phage types are scarce.
resultsWe compared two Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis (SEn) phage types, namely phage types 1 and 4 from available databases, using bioinformatic tools and nanopore sequencing of a Chilean PT1 strain. Comparisons between the two phage types show very low genomic divergence and high genomic sequence similarity. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) searches identified SNPs specific to each phage type. Although a translocated region was identified in the Chilean PT1 strain analyzed in this study when compared to the genome of a PT4 strain, this was not present in the genomes of other PT1 strains, suggesting a local strain-specific rearrangement. Further analyses yielded no differences in the CRISPR-Cas locus, but a slight difference was observed in Gifsy-2 prophage detection and DNA modification systems between PT1 and PT4 strains.
conclusionsOur findings provide insights into the genomic differences between SEn strains of two different phage types, serving as a basis for future genomic studies, yet further analyses with more diverse geographical locations collected over a longer time span are essential to validate these differences with the potential to establish molecular markers for strain identification and characterization in the context of epidemiological surveillance as a complement to WGS when this technique is not available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.