ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
A novel attention mechanism for noise-adaptive and robust segmentation of microtubules in microscopy images.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSegmenting cytoskeletal filaments in microscopy images is essential for studying their roles in cellular processes such as cell division and intracellular transport. However, this task is highly challenging due to the fine, densely packed, and intertwined nature of these structures. Imaging limitations-noise, low contrast, and uneven fluorescence-further complicate analysis. While deep learning has advanced segmentation of large, well-defined biological structures, its performance often degrades under such adverse conditions. Additional challenges include obtaining precise annotations for curvilinear structures and managing severe class imbalance during training.
resultsWe introduce a novel noise-adaptive attention mechanism that extends the Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) module to dynamically adjust to varying noise levels. Integrated into a U-Net decoder with residual encoder blocks, this yields ASE_Res_UNet, a lightweight yet high-performance model. To address annotation challenges, we developed a synthetic dataset generation strategy that ensures accurate annotations of fine filaments in noisy images, producing a synthetic dataset with two difficulty levels for segmentation benchmarking. We systematically evaluated loss functions and metrics to mitigate class imbalance, ensuring robust performance assessment. ASE_Res_UNet effectively segmented microtubules in noisy synthetic images, outperforming its ablated variants. It also demonstrated superior segmentation compared to models with alternative attention mechanisms or distinct architectures, while requiring fewer parameters, making it efficient for resource-constrained environments. Evaluation on a newly curated real microscopy dataset and a recently reannotated dataset highlighted ASE_Res_UNet's effectiveness in segmenting microtubules beyond synthetic images. For these datasets, ASE_Res_UNet was competitive with a recent synthetic data-driven approach that shares two cytoskeleton pretrained models. Importantly, ASE_Res_UNet showed strong transferability to other curvilinear structures (blood vessels and nerves) across diverse imaging conditions.
conclusionsThis work advances microtubule segmentation through three key contributions: (1) Providing two benchmark datasets (synthetic and real), addressing a critical gap in standardised evaluation resources for this task; (2) Introducing ASE_Res_UNet, a lightweight yet robust model combining noise-adaptive attention with residual learning; (3) Validating competitive performance across synthetic and real microscopy data. Additionally, we demonstrated the robustness and versatility of the proposed architecture across diverse curvilinear segmentation tasks, showcasing potential for broader applications in biological research and medical diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.