ArticleScientific reports2026
A low-cost "plant-scanner" platform for automated detection of Ustilago maydis infection in maize using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ustilago maydis is a biotrophic fungus that causes smut disease in maize, leading to tumor formation on aerial parts of the plant. While U. maydis has been a model for plant-fungal interaction studies, no tool has existed to automatically quantify infection symptoms under laboratory conditions for deep learning analysis. To address this, we developed a rotating camera system that captures videos of plants under customized lighting and shutter settings. These videos were used to train machine learning models to distinguish between healthy and infected plants. Two detection approaches have been presented. In the first approach, by employing a naive masking technique and combining classical machine learning classifiers utilizing handcrafted features, the model achieved a reasonable performance, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of maximum 0.90 on the Receiver Operating Characteristic in one of the classifiers, showing relatively high sensitivity and specificity. The second approach utilizes pre-trained YOLO11 model for object detection and further classification. The YOLO11-based approach outperforms traditional methods, achieving near-perfect validation accuracy (AUC: 0.99-1.00), demonstrating its superiority for real-time, scalable applications. Our toolset, featuring a cost-efficient and customizable scanning platform with open building-blocks design, provides a valuable resource as a proof-of-concept for unbiased disease symptom detection and scoring, with potential applications in other plant pathology studies. This point enables easy replication and adaptation by other research laboratories which makes the platform robust, scalable and practical beyond our specific application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.