Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42436201›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Comparative efficacy of eyelid cleansing wipes, hypochlorous acid, and saline for blepharitis-associated ocular surface disease: a randomized trial.

Ruijia Shi, Yihan Guo, Ao Li, Lei Tian, Ying Jie

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07759180 (A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of a Sterile Gauze Containing Natural Plant Extracts), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07759180 nacompletednot on this map

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of a Sterile Gauze Containing Natural Plant Extracts (Leniben®) for Eyelid Hygiene in Patients With Bilateral Anterior Blepharitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliera OO.RR. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'AragonaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled38ConditionsBlepharitisArmsPlant-Based Sterile Eyelid Gauze, Sterile Cotton Gauze Moistened with Saline Solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruijia Shi *Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yihan Guo *Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, China.
Ao Li *Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, China.
Lei TianBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, China. tianlei0131@163.com.
Ying JieBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, China. jie_yingcn@aliyun.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2649-8241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blepharitis and meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) commonly cause ocular surface symptoms, but comparative evidence for commonly used eyelid-cleansing strategies remains limited. We compared the 4-week efficacy of preformulated eyelid cleansing wipes, hypochlorous acid-assisted cleansing, and saline-assisted cleansing in adults with blepharitis-associated ocular surface disease. In this single-center, randomized, assessor-masked, parallel-group trial, adults aged 18-70 years were assigned to one of three cleansing interventions for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the baseline-adjusted Week 4 visual analog scale (VAS) score for the selected study eye in the full analysis set. Pairwise comparisons were performed only after a significant overall test, with Holm adjustment. Seventy-two participants were randomized; 64 were included in the full analysis set, and 59 had observed Week 4 VAS data. The overall between-group difference in baseline-adjusted Week 4 VAS was significant (P = 0.007). Adjusted mean Week 4 VAS values were 27.47 (95% CI, 22.18-32.76) in the wipe group, 33.16 (95% CI, 27.80-38.51) in the hypochlorous acid group, and 40.83 (95% CI, 34.93-46.72) in the saline group. The wipe group had lower Week 4 VAS than the saline group (adjusted difference, - 13.35; 95% CI, - 21.51 to - 5.20; Holm-adjusted P = 0.005). No other pairwise comparison remained significant. Between-group differences in Schirmer test result, corneal fluorescein staining, and MGD expressibility were interpreted as supportive secondary findings. In this single-center, assessor-masked randomized trial, preformulated eyelid cleansing wipes were associated with a lower baseline-adjusted Week 4 VAS symptom score than saline-assisted mechanical lid cleansing. Confirmatory superiority over hypochlorous acid was not established, and sign-based secondary findings should be interpreted as supportive.

Indexed as

BlepharitisEyelidsHypochlorous AcidMeibomian Gland DysfunctionSaline SolutionAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultHypochlorous AcidOphthalmic SolutionsSaline SolutionBlepharitisCleansing wipesEyelid hygieneHypochlorous acidMeibomian gland dysfunctionOcular surface disease

Identifiers

PMID42436201
PMCPMC13476242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.