ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026
Functional connectivity changes in obsessive-compulsive disorder following exposure and response prevention.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been increasingly linked to alterations in functional connectivity (FC) across large-scale brain networks, particularly the default mode (DMN), salience (SN), and central executive network (CEN), known as the triple-networks. However, little is known about how connectivity patterns evolve following treatment. We examined both static and dynamic resting-state FC in 25 adults with OCD and 21 matched healthy controls (HCs) at baseline, one week, and three months following intensive exposure and response prevention (ERP) using the Bergen 4-Day Treatment (B4DT). Independent component analysis (ICA) and sliding-window approaches were used to evaluate network connectivity within and between the triple networks. At baseline, adults with OCD showed stronger static connectivity within the DMN and SN and spent more time in a dynamic connectivity state characterized by strong connectivity within the DMN and decoupling between the DMN and SN compared to controls. Following the 4-day intensive treatment, these abnormal patterns normalized and remained stable at the three-month follow-up. A higher number of transitions between states was associated with reductions in the severity of OCD, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Additional correlation analyses indicated that higher baseline SN-CEN connectivity was associated with greater symptom severity, while post-treatment reductions in CEN and CEN-SN static connectivity were linked to improvements in depressive symptoms. These findings suggest that effective ERP promotes a normalization of both static and dynamic connectivity within and between the triple networks. Thus, dynamic metrics, alongside static measures, may serve as clinically meaningful biomarkers of therapeutic response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.